<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for MNVoters.org Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mnvoters.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mnvoters.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Blog Site for the Minnesota Voters Alliance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:34:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IRV Screws Up Colorado Election by Helpful Hints</title>
		<link>http://mnvoters.wordpress.com/2009/06/05/irv-screws-up-colorado-election/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Helpful Hints]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnvoters.wordpress.com/?p=136#comment-299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi there would you mind letting me know which web host you&#039;re utilizing? I&#039;ve loaded your blog 
in 3 different web browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot quicker 
then most. Can you suggest a good web hosting provider at a fair price?
Thanks, I appreciate it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there would you mind letting me know which web host you&#8217;re utilizing? I&#8217;ve loaded your blog<br />
in 3 different web browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot quicker<br />
then most. Can you suggest a good web hosting provider at a fair price?<br />
Thanks, I appreciate it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Voter ID Hypocrisy by Jeffrey L. Johnson, Major, Infantry, Retired</title>
		<link>http://mnvoters.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/voter-id-hypocrisy/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey L. Johnson, Major, Infantry, Retired]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnvoters.wordpress.com/?p=224#comment-268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your organization fails to come clean regarding the true costs of what you are proposing. Not only are you endorsing the disenfranchisement of tens of thousands of voters; you disguise the cost of acquiring documentation they would require citizens to qualify to vote. A certified birth certificate in Minnesota costs $26. a certified copy of your marriage license or divorce decree showing your change of last name usually costs $10 per hour for the search plus the cost of the certification. No one can document the costs of foreign birth certificates and Federal naturalization certificates with any certainty. Moreover, if you are disabled and require transportation to the courthouse and voter registration office, we&#039;re talking many trips to these offices in order to accomplish requesting and picking up the documentation. Commonly, these trips cost $75 each time assuming you do not require an assistant to accompany you and you are able to use public transportation. If you need private transportation and an attendant, the cost is usually more than $150 for each trip! That&#039;s just the tip of the iceberg.

I am a volunteer assisting a military veteran who is confined to a wheel chair. In addition to requiring transportation to the courthouse, he has a financial guardian. He is fully intellectually alert. He has a guardianship only because he cannot sign checks or other instruments. Yet, if the voter I.D. Amendment in Minnesota passes this fall, he will be automatically disqualified from voting because he has a guardian! By the way, he is a conservative Republican.

The claims of voter fraud and the necessity of laws to protect election integrity are a ruse. The issue is voter reliability! Republicans have instituted these claims and resulting law suits only because they believe they can document that &quot;these&quot; voters don&#039;t vote Republican. Democrats are nearly as misleading.

I condemn the Democrat Party for its failure to support cleaning up the voter registration process. The Pew Center recently found that our voter registration lists were full of errors. Democrats have not concerned themselves with this problem and appropriated funds and updated laws to take advantage of our increasing technological ability to keep our voter registration lists up to date and accurate. Moreover, they have done nothing to ensure that same day registrants / voters are actually qualified. 

Finally, neither party wants our military personnel to vote. Democrats believe that military personnel vote for Republicans. And, Republicans  no longer trust military voters after the 2008 election where Federally printed ballots used by the military voter overwhelmingly for Obama. They won&#039;t say it; but, they believe that our black NCO  corps influenced / intimidated enlisted subordinates to vote for Obama. As a result, our military personnel are no longer reliable voters in their eyes.

We are reaching a cross-road in American democracy. Money and power have combined behind one political party while the other has failed to recognize what is happening and has done nothing to protect American voters and their precious democracy. As s result, we are about to be governed by a plutocracy of power and wealth.

Years ago before I made my career the Army (24 years of Regular, active service, I was called a &quot;Goo-goo&quot; for good government type. I was consider naive by more cynical political operatives of both major parties. I didn&#039;t appreciate the importance of winning.

Recently, when I testified before the Minnesota State Senate about our proposed Voter I.D. amendment, I was loudly called a &quot;professional, parasitic veteran&quot; because of my opposition to the amendment by one of the amendment&#039;s supporters. Members of neither party said anything in my defense. Instead, they sat quietly by. It was easier to continue on with their own agendas and not deal with the importance of protecting our American democracy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your organization fails to come clean regarding the true costs of what you are proposing. Not only are you endorsing the disenfranchisement of tens of thousands of voters; you disguise the cost of acquiring documentation they would require citizens to qualify to vote. A certified birth certificate in Minnesota costs $26. a certified copy of your marriage license or divorce decree showing your change of last name usually costs $10 per hour for the search plus the cost of the certification. No one can document the costs of foreign birth certificates and Federal naturalization certificates with any certainty. Moreover, if you are disabled and require transportation to the courthouse and voter registration office, we&#8217;re talking many trips to these offices in order to accomplish requesting and picking up the documentation. Commonly, these trips cost $75 each time assuming you do not require an assistant to accompany you and you are able to use public transportation. If you need private transportation and an attendant, the cost is usually more than $150 for each trip! That&#8217;s just the tip of the iceberg.</p>
<p>I am a volunteer assisting a military veteran who is confined to a wheel chair. In addition to requiring transportation to the courthouse, he has a financial guardian. He is fully intellectually alert. He has a guardianship only because he cannot sign checks or other instruments. Yet, if the voter I.D. Amendment in Minnesota passes this fall, he will be automatically disqualified from voting because he has a guardian! By the way, he is a conservative Republican.</p>
<p>The claims of voter fraud and the necessity of laws to protect election integrity are a ruse. The issue is voter reliability! Republicans have instituted these claims and resulting law suits only because they believe they can document that &#8220;these&#8221; voters don&#8217;t vote Republican. Democrats are nearly as misleading.</p>
<p>I condemn the Democrat Party for its failure to support cleaning up the voter registration process. The Pew Center recently found that our voter registration lists were full of errors. Democrats have not concerned themselves with this problem and appropriated funds and updated laws to take advantage of our increasing technological ability to keep our voter registration lists up to date and accurate. Moreover, they have done nothing to ensure that same day registrants / voters are actually qualified. </p>
<p>Finally, neither party wants our military personnel to vote. Democrats believe that military personnel vote for Republicans. And, Republicans  no longer trust military voters after the 2008 election where Federally printed ballots used by the military voter overwhelmingly for Obama. They won&#8217;t say it; but, they believe that our black NCO  corps influenced / intimidated enlisted subordinates to vote for Obama. As a result, our military personnel are no longer reliable voters in their eyes.</p>
<p>We are reaching a cross-road in American democracy. Money and power have combined behind one political party while the other has failed to recognize what is happening and has done nothing to protect American voters and their precious democracy. As s result, we are about to be governed by a plutocracy of power and wealth.</p>
<p>Years ago before I made my career the Army (24 years of Regular, active service, I was called a &#8220;Goo-goo&#8221; for good government type. I was consider naive by more cynical political operatives of both major parties. I didn&#8217;t appreciate the importance of winning.</p>
<p>Recently, when I testified before the Minnesota State Senate about our proposed Voter I.D. amendment, I was loudly called a &#8220;professional, parasitic veteran&#8221; because of my opposition to the amendment by one of the amendment&#8217;s supporters. Members of neither party said anything in my defense. Instead, they sat quietly by. It was easier to continue on with their own agendas and not deal with the importance of protecting our American democracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Voter ID Hypocrisy by Paul Landskroener</title>
		<link>http://mnvoters.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/voter-id-hypocrisy/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Landskroener]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnvoters.wordpress.com/?p=224#comment-130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You continue to miss at least one point. The objection to requiring a photo ID to prove the voter&#039;s identity -- that is, to prove that the voter is who he says he is -- is not so troubling. But most voter ID bills also require that the ID be (a) current and valid and (b) have the voter&#039;s current address. This is the disenfranchising, objectionable part. Why does my expired passport or drivers license not prove who I am as well as my current one? And what about young and poor voters who move frequently? Do you really expect them to diligently purchase new drivers licenses or IDs every time they move, which can be every few months or more? I work as an election judge in a neighborhood with lots of students and immigrants in it (perhaps as many as 40% of all registered voters). Many of them move frequently, making getting new ID cards with current address very difficult and expensive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You continue to miss at least one point. The objection to requiring a photo ID to prove the voter&#8217;s identity &#8212; that is, to prove that the voter is who he says he is &#8212; is not so troubling. But most voter ID bills also require that the ID be (a) current and valid and (b) have the voter&#8217;s current address. This is the disenfranchising, objectionable part. Why does my expired passport or drivers license not prove who I am as well as my current one? And what about young and poor voters who move frequently? Do you really expect them to diligently purchase new drivers licenses or IDs every time they move, which can be every few months or more? I work as an election judge in a neighborhood with lots of students and immigrants in it (perhaps as many as 40% of all registered voters). Many of them move frequently, making getting new ID cards with current address very difficult and expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on League of Women Voters &#8211; Betrayal of Public Trust? by Gary McGath</title>
		<link>http://mnvoters.wordpress.com/2010/09/23/league-of-women-voters-betrayal-of-public-trust/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary McGath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 14:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnvoters.wordpress.com/?p=201#comment-105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve just posted an analysis of a rigged poll issued by the League of Women Voters:

http://www.mcgath.com/lowv_riggedpoll.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just posted an analysis of a rigged poll issued by the League of Women Voters:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mcgath.com/lowv_riggedpoll.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mcgath.com/lowv_riggedpoll.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on League of Women Voters &#8211; Betrayal of Public Trust? by Mike Downing</title>
		<link>http://mnvoters.wordpress.com/2010/09/23/league-of-women-voters-betrayal-of-public-trust/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Downing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnvoters.wordpress.com/?p=201#comment-52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andy: Great questions as well as logical &amp; rational responses to the questions!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy: Great questions as well as logical &amp; rational responses to the questions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IRV decision goes to the MN Supreme Court by Jaclyn Ingrahm</title>
		<link>http://mnvoters.wordpress.com/2009/03/21/irv-decision-goes-to-the-mn-supreme-court/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaclyn Ingrahm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 03:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnvoters.wordpress.com/?p=127#comment-47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was a Fantastic wordpress post, I will be sure to bookmark this post in my Diigo account. Have a awesome evening.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a Fantastic wordpress post, I will be sure to bookmark this post in my Diigo account. Have a awesome evening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On Thune&#8217;s Rant by Mike Downing</title>
		<link>http://mnvoters.wordpress.com/2010/04/26/on-thunes-rant/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Downing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnvoters.wordpress.com/?p=177#comment-43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very good response to Thune&#039;s angry &amp; emotion based comments on Voter ID.

I just received the forms to be an election judge. It is truly amazing the specificity of what constitutes an acceptable ID for election judges but none is required for voters. This is the definition of hypocrisy!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good response to Thune&#8217;s angry &amp; emotion based comments on Voter ID.</p>
<p>I just received the forms to be an election judge. It is truly amazing the specificity of what constitutes an acceptable ID for election judges but none is required for voters. This is the definition of hypocrisy!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On Thune&#8217;s Rant by Jean Sanford</title>
		<link>http://mnvoters.wordpress.com/2010/04/26/on-thunes-rant/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jean Sanford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnvoters.wordpress.com/?p=177#comment-42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good job.  We need to keep this issue and the &quot;discrepancy&quot; in the 2008 vote in the news.  Most voters are very apolitical and really do not educate themselves about issues, almost no issue at all.  That is why most voters follow their family voting pattern.

It is the thoughtful voter that really educated themselves before voting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job.  We need to keep this issue and the &#8220;discrepancy&#8221; in the 2008 vote in the news.  Most voters are very apolitical and really do not educate themselves about issues, almost no issue at all.  That is why most voters follow their family voting pattern.</p>
<p>It is the thoughtful voter that really educated themselves before voting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IRV decision goes to the MN Supreme Court by Burton Haynes</title>
		<link>http://mnvoters.wordpress.com/2009/03/21/irv-decision-goes-to-the-mn-supreme-court/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burton Haynes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 02:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnvoters.wordpress.com/?p=127#comment-40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been reading a few posts and really and enjoy your writing.  I&#039;m just starting up my own blog and only hope that I can write as well and give the reader so much insight.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been reading a few posts and really and enjoy your writing.  I&#8217;m just starting up my own blog and only hope that I can write as well and give the reader so much insight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Primary v. General by Ken Salerno</title>
		<link>http://mnvoters.wordpress.com/2009/06/25/primary-v-general/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Salerno]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnvoters.wordpress.com/?p=155#comment-39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You IDIOTS. This story simply means that if more than two candidates file for each office or for each party -- normally making a primary necessary -- IRV will be used INSTEAD. Your ignorance seems to know no bounds.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You IDIOTS. This story simply means that if more than two candidates file for each office or for each party &#8212; normally making a primary necessary &#8212; IRV will be used INSTEAD. Your ignorance seems to know no bounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
